US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Townsend v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
as 3:2023cv02505
Plaintiff:
Melba Townsend
Defendant:
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas d/b/a Methodist Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Valdez v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
as 3:2023cv02327
Plaintiff:
GLORIA VALDEZ
Defendant:
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas doing business as Methodist Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Paez v. Childrens Health System of Texas
as 3:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Alexander Paez
Defendant:
Childrens Health System of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Sample v. SLI Enterprises Inc et al
as 3:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Donel Sample
Defendant:
SLI Enterprises Inc, David Scott Forbes and Zackary Shea Adams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Hagans v. Child Care Group
as 3:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Natalia Hagans
Defendant:
Child Care Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jackson v. PDI Technologies Inc
as 3:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
PDI Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Avalos v. Freemyer Industrial Pressure, LP
as 4:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Juan Avalos
Defendant:
Freemyer Industrial Pressure, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Rodriguez v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anna Nicole Rodriguez
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanders v. Moneygram International Inc
as 3:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Catherine Sanders
Defendant:
Moneygram International Inc
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
