US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 131 - 140 of 111,043
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02361
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Notice of Removal of Criminal Prosecution
Simpson v. Armstrong et al
as 5:2024cv00209
Defendant:
Eric Guy, Krystal Sherrill, Coley Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett V. Doe 7:24-cv-123-O
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Brian Bennett
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-00123-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SemiLED Innovations LLC v. Craftmade International Inc
as 3:2024cv02349
Defendant:
Craftmade International Inc
Plaintiff:
SemiLED Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Anderson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Frank Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America (IRS) et al v. Ries et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Schuminsky Investments v. Federal Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
SCHUMINSKY INVESTMENTS
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Loftis v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2024cv00121
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Pamela Loftis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Huffman v. RV Retailer of Texas LLC
as 3:2024cv02332
Defendant:
RV Retailer of Texas LLC doing business as Motor Home Specialist
Plaintiff:
Donna L Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
BSR Lambert, LLC v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
BSR Lambert, LLC
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
