US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 276
Valle v. Plantgistix Sabine, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
Cody Valle
Defendant:
Plantgistix Sabine, LLC and Quantix SCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rutledge v. Union Pacific RR Co.
as 4:2023cv00782
Defendant:
Union Pacific RR Co.
Plaintiff:
De'Ron Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
McTorry v. Nexus Health Systems, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04479
Plaintiff:
Chase McTorry
Defendant:
Nexus Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
West v. ISD Renal, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Kristian West
Defendant:
ISD Renal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Delaney v. A.J. Hurt, Jr., Inc.
as 4:2022cv04060
Plaintiff:
Ashlea Delaney
Defendant:
A.J. Hurt, Jr., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Mintz v. First Continental Mortgage, Ltd.
as 4:2022cv04062
Plaintiff:
Libby Mintz
Defendant:
First Continental Mortgage, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Ozenne v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv03694
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ozenne, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv02990
Plaintiff:
Quincy Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Harris v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
as 4:2022cv02837
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Nickel v. Post Acute Medical, LLC
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Nickel
Defendant:
Post Acute Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
