US District Court for the Western District of Texas Real Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Carlin v. Titeflex Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00920
Plaintiff:
Ted Carlin and Ted Carlin
Defendant:
Titeflex Corporation, Gastite Division and Titeflex Corporation, Gastite Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
West Avenue Panchito's Mexican Restaurant, L.P. v. Robot Coupe U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00700
Plaintiff:
West Avenue Panchito's Mexican Restaurant, L.P. and West Avenue Panchito's Mexican Restaurant, L.P.
Defendant:
Robot Coupe U.S.A., Inc. and Gepman s.a.s.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cunningham et al v. Marvin Windows, Inc.
as 6:2007cv00234
Plaintiff:
Steve Cunningham and Gail Cunningham
Defendant:
Marvin Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Lopez v. Medtronic Corporation
as 5:2007cv00471
Plaintiff:
Diana Lopez
Defendant:
Medtronic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Time Manufacturing Company v. Freightliner LLC et al
as 6:2007cv00136
Plaintiff:
Time Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Freightliner LLC, Arvin-Merritor, Inc., Haldex Brake Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carmack Properties L v. NuTone, Inc., et al
as 1:2006cv00262
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathews, et al v. Glasser
as 5:2005cv01163
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Colonial Real Estate v. Kyocera Mita
as 6:2005cv00392
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allstate County v. Whirlpool Corp., et al
as 5:2005cv00513
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
More JB, Inc. v. Nutone, Inc.
as 1:2005cv00338
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
