US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 7,354
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villalon v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01198
Petitioner:
Hugo Villalon
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01199
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craig v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2022cv01229
Petitioner:
Carl Craig
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds and Jennifer A. Tharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavero v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Abel Chavero
Respondent:
FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yarbrough v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01138
Petitioner:
Jimmy Don Yarbrough
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Land v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Joshua Land and Joshua L. Land
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mora v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01156
Petitioner:
Wilibaldo Mora
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hawes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Richard Vonzell Hawes
Respondent:
Warden FNU Almonza and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv01156
Petitioner:
Dennis Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
