US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 7,422
Bryant v. Salazar
as 5:2022cv01279
Petitioner:
Terrance Bryant
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01285
Petitioner:
Stanley Foster Baker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Williamson County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01262
Petitioner:
Federico Rodriguez
Respondent:
Williamson County Jail, FNU Fuller and Bradford J. Glendening
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01232
Petitioner:
Israel Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hidrogo v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01246
Petitioner:
Eliseo Hidrogo
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2022cv00428
Petitioner:
Carlos E. Lopez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barrera v. Hudson
as 7:2022cv00241
Petitioner:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Respondent:
Jericka Hudson and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Dominguez State Jail et al
as 5:2022cv01245
Petitioner:
David D. Valdez
Respondent:
Dominguez State Jail and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01199
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
