District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 440,272
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jean v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01421
Petitioner:
Joseph F. Jean
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silvas v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas, Jr
Defendant:
Lt. Warner, Sgt. Guiterez, Sgt. Syler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta, Jr. v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raul Anthony Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Detention Officer Ortiz, Detention Officer Salazar, Sgt. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. $212,963.00 U.S. Currency
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$212,963.00 U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nathasha Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gonzalez et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Alex Gonzalez and Carol Gonzalez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Amador et al v. DSP Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Justo Luis Duque Amador and Armondo Velazquez
Defendant:
DSP Trucking, Inc. and Romulo Bernal Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Walmart et al
as 1:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Erica Anderson
Defendant:
Walmart, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HANNA v. CANGSHAN CUTLERY COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HANNA
Defendant:
CANGSHAN CUTLERY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
