Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 41,184
King, Jr. v. Ndaru
as 9:2025cv00026
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennie K. Ndaru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2025cv00030
Plaintiff:
Larry J Hill
Defendant:
Officer FNU Doe 1 and Officer FNU Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thornton et al
as 1:2025cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lemoses Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Thornton and FNU Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sonnier v. Cadena et al
as 1:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Justin Gregory Sonnier
Defendant:
Chris Cadena, Larry Thorne, Pat Kilamtn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burpee
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Goodman Unit #349, Stiles Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Noble et al
as 1:2025cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jamaal R. Bradley
Defendant:
Chris Noble, M Panzino, Officer LaSable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Unknown Prison Employee
as 4:2025cv00440
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Unknown Prison Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Murphy et al
as 4:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kevin Glaspie
Defendant:
Tracy Murphy, FNU LNU and Rudy Glynn Vrba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. East Texas Treatment Facility et al
as 6:2025cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burpee
Defendant:
East Texas Treatment Facility, Rusk County, TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Rusk County et al
as 1:2025cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burpee
Defendant:
TDCJ and Goodman Unit #349
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.