Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Gomez v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Santos Gomez
Defendant:
Jessica Marsh, Joshua Castro, Kara Gougler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation and Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roque et al v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04355
Plaintiff:
Arlyn Roque and S.A.G.R.
Defendant:
OF AMERICA UNITED STATES and Loyal Source Government Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wiley v. Paxton et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wiley
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Marsha McClane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welsh v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Texas Civil Commitment Center, Julian Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. McLane et al
as 5:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Jessica Marsh, Jamie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Encalade v. State of Texas
as 5:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Clemont Encalade
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Cammack
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
James Thomas Cammack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pineda v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pineda
Defendant:
FNU Dobbs, FNU Buckle, FNU Guidry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
