District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 433,081
Longazel v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00818
Petitioner:
Christopher John Longazel
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. La Ruleta Sports Bar, et al.
as 5:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Marcos Hernandez
Defendant:
La Ruleta Sports Bar and Loraine Baladez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockwatch, Inc. v. Wan-Yo Enterprise Co., Ltd.
as 6:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
Shockwatch, Inc. doing business as Spotsee
Defendant:
Wan-Yo Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cherry v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice Personnel

as 4:2022cv04536
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Birch Racquet and Lawn Club v. Arch Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
The Birch Racquet and Lawn Club
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Combs v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 7:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Johnny Combs
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC et al v. Morris
as 3:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC and Nissan Extended Services North America, GP
Defendant:
Stephanie Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Chism-Brown v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 3:2023cv02628
Plaintiff:
Arma Gene Chism-Brown
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Motton v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 3:2023cv02633
Plaintiff:
Tina Motton
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
azevedo v. Wal-Mart Store Texas LLC
as 4:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Patricia azevedo
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Store Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.