Utah Labor Cases

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,323
Loveridge v. EMI Health et al
as 2:2019cv00438
Defendant: Utah Education Association, EMI Health
Plaintiff: Karen Loveridge
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kemper v. Micronet
as 2:2019cv00428
Defendant: Micronet
Plaintiff: Benjamin Kemper
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Williamson v. MGS By Design et al
as 2:2019cv00434
Defendant: Daniel Nelson, Kitts Group, Marble & Granite Solutions and others
Plaintiff: Lindsie Williamson
Cause Of Action: Collect Unpaid Wages
Richards et al v. C&C Sheet Metal et al
as 2:2019cv00418
Defendant: C&C Sheet Metal, Casey Jones, Sr, Casey Jones, Jr
Plaintiff: Utah Sheet Metal Contractors Industry Fund, Ian McKelvie, Tony Ericksen and others
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.
E. et al v. California Physicians Service
as 2:2019cv00415
Plaintiff: Paul E., Heather E., L. E.
Defendant: California Physicians Service
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Laukat et al v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah
as 2:2019cv00400
Plaintiff: Tevis Laukat, Brandon Laukat, Sheryl Laukat
Defendant: Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
B. et al v. AvMed
as 2:2019cv00396
Defendant: AvMed
Plaintiff: Andy B., Terri B., J. B.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
M. v. Regence BlueShield of Idaho
as 2:2019cv00381
Plaintiff: Kurt M.
Defendant: Regence BlueShield of Idaho
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Rufus v. Pacificorp et al
as 2:2019cv00377
Defendant: Pacificorp, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 57
Plaintiff: Stephen Rufus
Cause Of Action: Sherman-Clayton Act
Kupka v. Utah Pipe Trades Pension Plan et al
as 2:2019cv00372
Plaintiff: James Kupka
Defendant: Utah Pipe Trades Pension Plan, Utah Plan Trustees, Utah Pipe Trades Trust Funds
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?