US District Court for the District of Vermont Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 492
Peterson v. Scott et al
as 5:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Reuel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Phil Scott, Mark Levine
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. State of Vermont et al
as 5:2020cv00145
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Valente et al v. French et al
as 5:2020cv00135
Defendant:
William Mathis, Greater Rutland Supervisory Union, Jennifer Deck Samuelson
and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Valente, Joanna Buckley, Stephen Buckley
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Martel et al v. Condos
as 5:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Robert Frenier, Raoul Beaulieu, Brian Smith
and others
Defendant:
James Condos
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Segar v. Barnett et al
as 2:2020cv00126
Defendant:
LPL Financial, Justin Gregory Wicks, Wicks Finance Strategies
and others
Plaintiff:
Elliot Kim Segar
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union et al
as 5:2020cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Riley
Defendant:
David W. Baker, Beth Carter, Bill Yates
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gadreault v. Bent et al
as 2:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Walter Smith, Phil Danielson, Richard Berlandy
and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Gadreault
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Peterson v. Scott
as 5:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Phil Scott
Plaintiff:
Revel E. Peterson, Reuel E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Skoric v. Killington Ski Resort et al
as 5:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation, Killington Ski Resort
Plaintiff:
Ivo Skoric
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Saint Michael's College, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Daniel Dromeshauser, Saint Michael's College, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
