US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,333
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Fuma International LLC v. Altria Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Fuma International LLC
Defendant:
Altria Group, Inc., Nu Mark LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fuma International LLC v. Altria Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Fuma International LLC
Defendant:
Altria Group, Inc., Nu Mark LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
JCAI Inc. et al v. Wiseleap Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
JCAI Inc. and JCAI America Inc.
Defendant:
Wiseleap Solutions Inc. and Emyode Services Conseils Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
JCAI Inc. et al v. Wiseleap Solutions Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
JCAI Inc. and JCAI America Inc.
Defendant:
Wiseleap Solutions Inc. and Emyode Services Conseils Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Monarch Networking Solutions LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Monarch Networking Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
BioNTech SE et al v. CureVac SE
as 2:2023cv00222
Counter Defendant:
BIONTECH SE, BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Inc. Pfizer
Counter Claimant:
CureVac AG and Cure Vac AG
Defendant:
CureVac SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
