US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 601
Masiello v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John Masiello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00229
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Voit-Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sherry Voit-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
David C Thompson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mary Lillian Brooks and Gary Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dembo v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00217
Plaintiff:
Shireka Dembo
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated and Cook Medical LLC
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson And Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sydney Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Cindy Brooks and Robert Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johns v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Linda Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
