US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,823
Jackson v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Damian Jackson
Defendant:
Patricia West, Lloyd Banks, Michelle Dermyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mungin v. Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael Mungin
Defendant:
Unknown, Commonwealth of Virginia, S. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Duptys
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
DeQuan Ford
Defendant:
Deputys and Sheriff Duptys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NaJacque v. Grandfield et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. NaJacque
Defendant:
James L. Grandfield, Lily I. Wilder and Kylene M. Lovell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Darrin Mark Robertson
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Dist. CT. of Dallas Co et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Dist. CT. of Dallas Co, Brian Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Darrin Mark Robertson
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Sussex I State Prison
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Darrin Mark Robertson
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
