US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Labor Cases

Labor/Management Relations Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Feury v. Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, LLC
as 7:2012cv00022
Defendant: Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Randy Ralph Feury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Johnson et al v. Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, LLC
as 7:2011cv00552
Plaintiff: Donald Lee Anderson, James Eugene Blankenship, Jeffrey Bolling Breedlove and others
Defendant: Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC v. International Union, United Mine Workers of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00023
Plaintiff: Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC
Defendant: International Union, United Mine Workers of America and Local Union 7170, District 17, United Mine Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Dunlap v. L.E. Meyers Co. et al
as 5:2011cv00042
Plaintiff: James E. Dunlap
Defendant: L.E. Meyers Co. and MYR Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Martin v. Watkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00423
Plaintiff: Harry L. Martin, Jr.
Defendant: Thomas O. Watkins and Yokohama Tire Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, L.L.C. v. International Union, United Mine Workers of America et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Alliant Ammunition and Powder Co., L.L.C. et al v. Local 8-00495 of United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00254
Plaintiff: Alliant Ammunition and Powder Co., L.L.C., Alliant Ammunition and Powder Co., L.L.C., Alliant Techsystems, Inc. and others
Defendant: Local 8-00495 of United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, Donna S. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al v. THE INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAW et al
as 1:2009cv00049
Plaintiff: VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC., VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC., VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Defendant: THE INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAW, THE INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAW, THE INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Labor None
Cornell v. Auto Truck Transport Corporation et al
as 7:2009cv00051
Plaintiff: Larry P. Cornell
Defendant: Auto Truck Transport Corporation, Pulaski Community Hospital, Inc. and Dr. Stephen Kracht
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Defendant
Quesenberry et al v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00022
Plaintiff: Mary Quesenberry, Paul E. Hollandsworth, Walter E. Viers and others
Defendant: Volvo Group North America Inc. and Volvo Trucks North America REtiree Healthcare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?