Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,284
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Deborah S. Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ingram v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Keri L. Ingram
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Meade v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chasity N. Meade
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peters v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dustin E. Peters
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 7:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Dean
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Montalvo v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Brandon Montalvo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shue v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
Apryl D. Shue
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Manzella v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Manzella
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Greene v. Commissioner
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Amanda Janette Greene
Defendant:
Commissioner for Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cooke v. Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Cooke
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
