Virginia Torts - Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,509
Menerick et al v. Salem Heritage, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Christopher Menerick and Amy Menerick
Defendant:
Salem Heritage, LLC, Greg Hunter and Matt McFatter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lau v. Ke
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
LAI LAU
Defendant:
BIN KE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Ball et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Richard Ball and Patricia Ball
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caldwell et al v. United Auto Sales, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Matthew Caldwell and Lanora Tillman
Defendant:
United Auto Sales, LLC and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Carter v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Janice Carter
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Karki v. Bank Of America N.A et al
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Saman Dhoj Karki
Defendant:
Bank Of America N.A, Coinbase Inc., Crypto.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fees Transfer Act
Nguyen v. Hoang
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Vicky Hoang Nguyen
Defendant:
Khoa Dang Hoang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Neal et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Neal and Abingdon Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael C. Neal and Cynthia Ann Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Allergy and Asthma Network Mothers of Asthmatics, Inc. v. Winders
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Allergy and Asthma Network Mothers of Asthmatics, Inc.
Defendant:
Tonya Winders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Bo v. Tang, et al.
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
ZHENGFENG BO
Defendant:
RUI TANG and CONNECTCHAIN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
