Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 10,803
Tri-Hope Life Ministries, et al. v. County of Powhatan, Virginia, et al.
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tri-Hope Life Ministries, Joel B. Hughes and Powers and Associates II, LLC
Defendant:
County of Powhatan, Virginia and The Powhatan County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Talley v. Valley Health System
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Margery Talley
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Oh v. Dexian et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oh
Defendant:
Dexian and CACI International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ignatius, Pharmacy Manager
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Van Prince
Defendant:
Ignatius, Pharmacy Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Oh v. Dexian et al
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oh
Defendant:
Dexian and CACI International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Shahid v. South African Airways et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kesha M. Shahid
Defendant:
South African Airways, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bui v. Lam et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Khai Bui
Defendant:
Van Lam and Thomas F. Gabbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Chamika Richardson
Defendant:
Louis Robinson, Devon Gwyn, Amani Eisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
