Washington Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 9,443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallory v. Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families et al
as 3:2024cv05135
Plaintiff:
Amber Jean Mallory
Defendant:
Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Katie Davis, Shawn Guren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stuart Robinson v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05129
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raikoglo v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv05128
Plaintiff:
Lance Raikoglo and Kimberly Klobas
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bowen
Defendant:
Clark County, Grant Hagen, Austin Cloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knapp v. Goudschaal
as 3:2024cv05118
Plaintiff:
Richard E Knapp
Defendant:
Dustin Goudschaal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
