U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Young v. Starr
as 3:2025cv00053
Petitioner:
Kareem Al-Jamal Young
Respondent:
Warden M. Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mayes v. Ayers et al
as 5:2025cv00029
Petitioner:
Keejuan Mayes
Respondent:
Lt. A. Ayers, Lt. Kinder, Ms. Shay Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Studer v. United States of America
as 5:2025cv00025
Petitioner:
Lindsey Jay Studer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Ray
as 3:2025cv00004
Petitioner:
Christopher Wells
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vinson v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Adrian A. Vinson
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayes v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00219
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, Jamie Gray, Nurse Practitioner Lacey and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flint v. Staff at Hazelton USP
as 5:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Mark Louis Flint, II
Respondent:
Staff at Hazelton USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watson v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
William Jauron Watson
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stovall v. Ray, Warden
as 5:2024cv00176
Respondent:
H.L. Ray, Warden
Petitioner:
Jacquill Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MacColl v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00125
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Petitioner:
John C. MacColl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
