US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 182
McClure v. Tygart County Regional Jail
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Christie Coy McClure, Jr.
Defendant:
Tygart County Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Respondent:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Shamain Johnson
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Dr. Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Good v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Tamia Nishay Good
Respondent:
Ms. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Farr v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Farr
Defendant:
William Marshall, WV Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pruntytown Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
