US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 104,535
Spradling v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00782
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leo W. Spradling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moffatt v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00780
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moffatt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sizemore v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00781
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00682
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Graham
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardwick et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00683
Plaintiff:
Oma Hardwick and Charles Hardwick
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharpe v. C. R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00686
Plaintiff:
Steven Clyde Sharpe
Defendant:
C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Topping et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00687
Plaintiff:
Sherry D. Topping and Mark Topping
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manns v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00684
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diane Lee Manns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casino v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00671
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C.R. Bard Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ann Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roush v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00685
Plaintiff:
Dianna L. Roush
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
