US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,879
Beacham v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00577
Petitioner:
Amos Lawrence Beacham
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hobbs v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
Johnny S. Hobbs
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hedrick et al v. Stored Value Cards et al
as 2:2024cv00572
Defendant:
Stored Value Cards, Kroll Settlement Adm. LLC and NumireleaseCard@sylaw.com
Plaintiff:
Matthew Addair Hedrick and Richard Lee Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Heckard et al
as 5:2024cv00581
Defendant:
Hodovan, Staples, Mr. B. L. Fain and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Matthews v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Akiba Matthews
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Armstrong v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Ronald Armstrong
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flint v. Staff at Hazelton USP
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Mark Louis Flint, II
Defendant:
Staff at Hazelton USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Perez v. Alderson FPC et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Respondent:
Alderson FPC, Unit Manager Ms. Dillon, Case Manager Ms. Walton and others
Petitioner:
Tatiana Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kinlaw v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Timothy Kinlaw
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fickling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00563
Petitioner:
Riheem Fickling
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.