US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 4,914
Workman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00556
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
Dishannon Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ferrone v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00557
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ferrone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lafond v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Juvonta Lafond
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hatten v. Plymale et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Jonatan Sweeny, Cabell County and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Douglas Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Defendant:
James Floyd Phillips and Town of Iaeger
Plaintiff:
Ricky Johnson and Amanda Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adair v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00549
Petitioner:
Antoinette Adair
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dukes v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Sophia Loraine Dukes
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gulley v. Nunley
as 1:2024cv00546
Respondent:
C. Nunley
Petitioner:
Michael A. Gulley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hooker v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Caleb Hooker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bartleson v. Fox et al
as 5:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Karl W. Bartleson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Fox, Ballard, Nurse Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
