West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,920
Stewart v. Mucciola et al
as 5:2022cv00238
Plaintiff: Brian M. Stewart
Defendant: Gabrielle E. Mucciola, Judge Tucker, Morgantown WV Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Winters et al
as 2:2022cv00419
Plaintiff: Michael A. Scott, Sr. and Michael A Scott, Jr.
Defendant: Zachary Winters, Adam Mason and The City of Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knotts v. Bailey
as 2:2022cv00416
Plaintiff: Zachary Knotts
Defendant: Jennifer Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knotts v. Bailey
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff: Zachary Knotts
Defendant: Honorable Jennifer Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook, Jr. v. Lanham et al
as 5:2022cv00234
Plaintiff: James Edward Cook, Jr.
Defendant: B. Kelly Lanham and Aaron Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Sanders et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff: Evon Stephens
Defendant: Lt. Sanders and Captain Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stewart v. Reichard et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff: Brian Stewart
Defendant: Timothy Reichard, Michele Stewart, Rodney Alan Stewart, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manriquez v. Kanawha County Sheriffs
as 2:2022cv00406
Plaintiff: Samuel Manriquez
Defendant: Kanawha County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Tate
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: Jesse Colin Campbell
Defendant: Didymus Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff: Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant: Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?