District of West Virginia Court Cases

Cases filed


Cases 41 - 50 of 125,538
Earle v. Shreves et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff: Vernon Norman Earle
Defendant: Shreves, J. Rivera, R. Domas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. , Teva Neuroscience, Inc.
Defendant: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan Inc., Natco Pharma Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hardison
as 2:2017mc00011
Petitioner: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent: Richard E. Hardison, Jr.
Jesson v. Watt et al
as 3:2017cv00005
Plaintiff: Wilbur Jesson
Defendant: Robert Paul Watt , Karrine Hudlow
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Auto Negligence
Massey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00605
Plaintiff: Christel Dawn Massey
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Hubbard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00615
Plaintiff: Kelli Hubbard
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Arnold v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00612
Plaintiff: Nathan Eddy Arnold
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Walls v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00604
Plaintiff: Linda Walls
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff: Randall Powell
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Powell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00613
Plaintiff: Donna Lee Powell
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?