US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 393
Rewolinski v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
Scott Rewolinski
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savetwith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Susan Savetwith
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orlowski v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00262
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence Orlowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00266
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Tammy Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gretz v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc and C R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gretz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grzeca v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
John Grzeca
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Lisa Schmidt and Andy Schmidt
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00261
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Jerald Edward Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 2:2020cv01897
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
James J. Daniel and James J Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leibfried et al v. Caterpillar Inc
as 2:2020cv01874
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc
Plaintiff:
Kelly Leibfried and Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
