US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Drought v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drought
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Jeffrey B. Norman, Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of Milwaukee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Turner v. Astronautics Corporation of America
as 2:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
Douglas G Turner
Defendant:
Astronautics Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Tappa v. 4imprint Inc
as 1:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Tappa
Defendant:
4imprint Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Bartolutti v. Argon Industries Inc
as 2:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
Greg Bartolutti
Defendant:
Argon Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Pescheck v. BMO Harris Bank NA
as 2:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Catherine Pescheck
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Beck v. Kunes Auto Group
as 2:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Jason Beck
Defendant:
Kunes Auto Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Lacy v. Kohl's Corporation
as 2:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lacy
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Liedke v. Brunswick Corporation
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
shereen liedke
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Foren v. LBC Optics Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jodi Foren
Defendant:
LBC Optics Inc and Wisconsin Vision Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Periman v. ProHealth Care Inc
as 2:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
Marc Periman
Defendant:
ProHealth Care, Inc. and ProHealth Care Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
