McDonnell v. McCarthy et al (INMATE1)
1:2006cv00347 |
April 17, 2006 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Dothan Office |
Mark E. Fuller |
Susan Russ Walker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER that: (1) The 29 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; and (2) That this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of the plaintiff to comply with the orders of this court. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/24/2009. (cb, ) |
Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure of the plf to comply with the orders of this court; Objections to R&R due by 2/17/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 2/4/2009. (wcl, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full as further set out; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at HCJ; furn:cashier. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 4/18/06. (vma, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McDonnell v. McCarthy et al (INMATE1) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.