Cunningham v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Billy G. Cunningham
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2008cv00417
Filed: June 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Geneva
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER; that the plaintiff's petition for attorney fees 22 is GRANTED as further set out in this order. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 2/22/2011. (jg, )
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 6/14/2010. (cb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billy G. Cunningham
Represented By: Georgia Hidle Ludlum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?