Davis v. CDA, Incorporated

Plaintiff: James O. Davis
Defendant: CDA, Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2009cv00406
Filed: May 5, 2009
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Dale
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 10, 2010 18 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERED that CDAs 12 Motion to join the United States Secretary of the Army under Rule 19 or, in the alternative, to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party under Rule 12(b)(7), is DENIED as further set out. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 2/10/2010. (cb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. CDA, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James O. Davis
Represented By: Tammy Cecile Murphy Woolley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDA, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?