Flowers v. Ozark Health and Rehab

Plaintiff: Delana N. Flowers
Defendant: Ozark Health and Rehab
Case Number: 1:2009cv00620
Filed: July 1, 2009
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 6, 2010 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; the dft's 14 Motion to Dismiss is granted; and this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b) and this court's inherent authority to enforce its orders. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 5/6/2010. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flowers v. Ozark Health and Rehab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delana N. Flowers
Represented By: Joseph Brady Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ozark Health and Rehab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?