Payne v. Astrue (CONSENT)

Plaintiff: William Lord Payne
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2011cv00416
Filed: June 2, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Dale
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 10, 2012 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the Court concludes that the ALJ's non-disability determination is supported by substantial evidence and proper application of the law and that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; that a separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 4/10/2012. (cc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Lord Payne
Represented By: Quinn Eric Brock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?