Jones v. AWC Logistics of Dothan, LLC, et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 27, 2013
ORDER directing that the 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is well-taken and due to be GRANTED; further ORDERED that, based on the representations of Plaintiff's counsel and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's counsel's 62 Motion for Le ave to Withdraw as Counsel of Record and to Continue Trial is GRANTED, and the pretrial hearing and trial of this matter are CONTINUED GENERALLY; Plaintiff James Jones is further ORDERED that he shall either obtain new counsel or inform the Court in writing that he wishes to proceed pro se (on his own) in this matter no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, as further set out; The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff James Jones at his address o n record with the Clerk's office; A hearing is set for August 2, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2A, United States Courthouse, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, as further set out; further ORDERED that Plaintiff's 62 Motion to Continue Motion and Final Pretrial Hearing is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/27/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WR) (Term'd Non Jury Trial 08/05/2013) (scn, )
|April 1, 2013
ORDER directing as follows: (1) The parties' 50 Motion is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff shall designate his experts on or before May 1, 2013; (3) Defendants shall designate their experts on or before June 1, 2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/1/13. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?