Amos v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff: Gregory Amos
Defendant: State of Alabama
Case Number: 1:2012cv00475
Filed: May 31, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 28, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION and ORDER that it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) and for the Plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of this court and his failure to properly continue the prosecution of this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/28/12. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amos v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Amos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?