McBride v. Houston County Health Care Authority et al
| Courtney McBride |
| Houston County Health Care Authority, Dinish Karumanchi, City of Dothan, Greg Benton and Board of Commissioners of the City of Dothan |
| 1:2012cv01047 |
| November 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
398
ORDER directing that this case is closed administratively pending the appeal. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/22/15. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
392
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that plaintiff Courtney McBride's oral objection to the civil Allen charge is overruled. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/17/2015. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
381
ORDER that plaintiff Courtney McBride is to respond by noon on 7/13/2015, tot he argument that she is not entitled to punitive damages as set forth in defendant Dinesh Karumanchi's 377 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/10/2015. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
375
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the court still has jurisdiction over the state-law claim against defendant Dinesh Karumanchi. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/8/2015.(kh, )
|
|
Filing
372
ORDERED that this defendant's motion in limine (doc. no. 310 ) and motion to quash (doc. no. 368 ) are denied as moot; that its outstanding objections to plaintiff Courtney McBride's deposition designations, exhibit list, and witness list (doc. nos. 311 , 312 , and 313 ) are overruled as moot; and that plaintiff McBride's objection to the Health Care Authority's exhibit list (doc. no. 301 ) is overruled as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/6/2015. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
292
OPINION AND ORDER that defendant Dinesh Karumanchi's 199 Motion to Exclude Dr. Robert Auerbach, Dr. Carla Rodgers, and Dr. Allan Nineberg is denied as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/11/2015. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
259
ORDERED that defendant Dinesh Karmunachi's 184 & 212 motions to strike are denied. In resolving the pending summary-judgment motions, the court has implicitly considered the motions to strike as a notice of objections to the testimony described and has considered any related briefs as arguments on the objections; as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/30/2015. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
192
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff's 145 Motion to Compel Production of Personnel File of Defendant Dinesh Karumanchi and Deposition of Corporate Representative of Defendant Houston County Healthcare Authority be and is hereby DENIED as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/15/2014. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
189
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) Defendants' 133 Motion to Strike the Testimony and/or Opinion of Plaintiff's Expert Carol E. Dankin, and 134 Motion to Strike and Exclude Testimony of Carol Dakin PhD, RN be and are hereby DE NIED as further set out in the order. (2) Defendants 136 Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Testimony From Plaintiffs Experts, 138 Motion to Strike and Preclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Carla Rodgers, Dr. Allan Nineberg, and Dr. Robert Auerbach, and 151 Supplemental Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Testimony From Plaintiffs Experts be and are hereby DENIED as further set out in the order. (3) To the extent that Defendants request that Dr. Nineberg be stricken as an expert witness, the 109 Motion to Strike, 110 Motion to Strike, 136 Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Testimony From Plaintiffs Experts, and 151 Supplemental Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Testimony From Plaintiffs Experts be and are hereby DENIED as f urther set out in the order. (4) To the extent Defendants request that Dr. Nineberg supplement his written report, the 109 Motion to Strike, 110 Motion to Strike, 136 Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Testimony From Plaintiffs Experts, and [ 151] Supplemental Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Testimony From Plaintiffs Experts be and are hereby GRANTED as further set out in the order. Dr. Nineberg shall supplement his report within seven (7) days of the date of this order. Defendants e xperts shall have fourteen (14) days from the date that Plaintiff submits Dr. Ninebergs supplemented written report, to supplement their written reports. (5) To the extent that Defendants request that the Plaintiff be prohibited from conducting disco very on issues contained in Dr. Rodgers expert report that exceed the scope of the Plaintiffs complaint, the 109 Motion to Strike, and 110 Motion to Strike be and are hereby DENIED as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/3/2014. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
102
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting Defendant's 101 Joint MOTION for Protective Order as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/7/2014. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) Plf's 58 Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order, 60 Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order be and are hereby DENIED; (2) The parties have until on or before 3 /7/2014 to submit a joint proposed protective order to govern Plf's psychiatric treatment records; (3) Plf's 83 Motion to Compel Supplemental Responses be and is hereby DENIED; and (4) Dft's 63 Motion to Compel be and is hereby DENIED; however, the dft is granted leave to conduct up to five additional discovery requests related to plf's medical treatment history. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/24/2014. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
