Wiregrass Metal Trades Council A.F. L-CI.O. v. Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
||Wiregrass Metal Trades Council A.F. L-CI.O.
||Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.
||February 11, 2013
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Mark E. Fuller
||Susan Russ Walker
|Nature of Suit:
||Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 30, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) Wiregrass Metal Trades Counsel, AFL-CIO's Objection (Doc. # 40 ) is OVERRULED; (2) Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.'s Objection (Doc. # 41 ) is OVERRULED; (3) The Recommendat ion of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 39 ) is ADOPTED; (4) Wiregrass Metal Trades Counsel, AFL-CIO's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 24 ) is DENIED; and (5) Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.'s Motion to Vacate Arbitrator's Award (Doc. # 26 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on March 30, 2015. (scn, )
|August 21, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: 1) Plf Wiregrass Metal Trades Council A.F.L.-CI.O.'s 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which the Court construes as a motion to compel arbitration, is GRANTED, as further set out; 2) The parties are further ORDERED to file a jointly prepared report on the status of this case. The first such report shall be filed on 9/13/2013, and the parties shall thereafter file a jointly prepared report on the first Tuesday of every month, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/21/2013. (wcl, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?