Whitehead v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	#	Document Text
June 3, 2014	9	ORDER directing that the court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7 ), and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of his arrest on August 16, 2010 is DISMISSED with prejudi ce pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as the plaintiff failed to file the complaint within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation; (2) The plaintiff's claims against defendants Valeska and Shields are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); (3) The plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i i) as it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; (4) To the extent the plaintiff presents claims challenging the constitutionality of his conviction by the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama and the incarceration resulting from this conviction, these claims are DISMISSED in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not cognizable in the instant civil action; (5) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and (iii). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/3/14. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

• Search for Party Aliases
• Associated Cases
• Attorneys
• Case File Location
• Case Summary
• Docket Report
• History/Documents
• Parties
• Related Transactions
• Check Status