Reed v. Winn Dixie Inc.

Plaintiff: Jean Reed
Defendant: Winn Dixie Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv00702
Filed: September 22, 2015
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Geneva
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 21, 2016 19 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant Winn-Dixie, Inc.'s 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff Jean Reed's disparate impact and retaliation claims (Counts I and II, respectively) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. Plaintiff Jean Reed's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray Borden on 3/21/2016. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. Winn Dixie Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Reed
Represented By: Letta Dillard Gorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Winn Dixie Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?