Wrinn v. The City of Dothan, Alabama (MAG+)

Plaintiff: Dawn Wrinn
Defendant: The City of Dothan, Alabama
Case Number: 1:2016cv01011
Filed: December 30, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Gray M. Borden
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 13, 2017 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING plf's ORAL MOTION for Protective Order to the extent plf seeks to reschedule her deposition, and DENIED in all other respects, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 6/13/17. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wrinn v. The City of Dothan, Alabama (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Wrinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Dothan, Alabama
Represented By: Stephanie H. Mays
Represented By: Tiffany Parrish Rainbolt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?