Russ v. Valenza (INMATE 3)
| Billy Ray Russ |
| Donald Valenza |
| 1:2018cv00733 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Houston |
| Gray M Borden |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable. #4 Order, Application for IFP, #2 Order, #3 Order mailed to Billy Ray Russ returned by USPS with the following notation, "Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward." (dmn, ) (NO PDF) |
Filing 4
ORDER: It is ORDERED that Petitioner is GRANTED an extension of time from 9/4/2018, to and including 9/28/2018, to either submit the $5.00 filing fee in this habeas corpus action or file the appropriate affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in compliance with this courts order of 8/21/2018 (Doc. #3 ). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to SEND Petitioner: (1) copies of the courts two orders of 8/21/2018 (Docs. #2 & #3 ); and (2) a form for use in filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 9/13/2018. Copy with #2 Order, #3 Order, and IFP form mailed to Petitioner as directed.(dmn, )
|
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable. #2 Order and #3 Order Mail sent to Billy Ray Russ was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender", "Not At This Address" (No pdf attached to this entry) (kh, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Before the court is Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner has not submitted the $5.00 filing fee, nor has he submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED that on or before 9/4/2018, Petitioner shall either submit the $5.00 filing fee or file the appropriate affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as further set out in the order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to SEND Petitioner a form for use in filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 8/21/2018. Copy with IFP form mailed to Petitioner as directed.(dmn, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER that Petitioner's initial filing (Doc. #1 ) be docketed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to amend the court docket to reflect the instant proceeding is properly filed as an action under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 8/21/2018. (dmn, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Billy Ray Russ. (No Filing Fee; No IFP)(beh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Russ v. Valenza (INMATE 3) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Billy Ray Russ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Donald Valenza | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
