Britt v. Experian et al (MAG+)
Plaintiff: Kenneth Britt
Defendant: Craig Boundy and Experian
Case Number: 1:2019cv00361
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Referring Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. #6 ) filed on June 28, 2019, which comports with FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action has been dismissed with prejudice by operation of Rule 41, on the terms agreed to and set out by the parties. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/1/2019. (kh, )
June 28, 2019 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint Stipulation of Dismissal) by Experian and Kenneth Britt. (Young, Leilus) Modified on 6/28/2019 to add as filed on behalf of the plaintiff (kh, ).
June 3, 2019 Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Experian re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Young, Leilus)
May 28, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE by Craig Boundy, Experian and Kenneth Britt Joint Notice of Settlement (Young, Leilus) Modified on 5/28/2019 to add as filed on behalf of the plaintiff (kh, ).
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE, pursuant to 28 USC 636, to Magistrate Judge Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/24/2019. (wcl, )
May 24, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Experian; Corporate Disclosures due by 6/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(wcl, )
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Experian from Small Claims Court of Dale County, AL, case number 26-SM-19-000083.00. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602053623) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Amended State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Civil Filing Fee)(kh, )
May 21, 2019 COMPLAINT against Craig Boundy, filed by Kenneth Britt.(no pdf document attached to this entry - see docket entry #1 for pdf)(kh, )
May 21, 2019 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Craig Boundy, Experian, filed by Kenneth Britt.(no pdf document attached to this entry - see docket entry #1 for pdf)(kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Britt v. Experian et al (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Boundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian
Represented By: Leilus Jackson Young, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Britt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?