McDougald v. Walmart et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: R. Terry McDougald
Defendant: Municipal Court of Ozark and Walmart
Case Number: 1:2020cv01012
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: W Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order entered on this date adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER:On January 4, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #3 ) to which Plaintiff filed an objection (Doc. #4 ) After an independent review of the file, and upon consideration of the Recommendation and Plaintiff's objection thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED.2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 3. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED.4. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) for plaintiffs failure to pay the full filing fee upon initiation of this case. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/21/2021. (dmn, )
January 21, 2021 Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by R. Terry McDougald. (am, )
January 4, 2021 Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED; The undersigned further RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 1/18/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 1/4/21. (am, )
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by R. Terry McDougald. (hrs, )
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Municipal Court of Ozark, Walmart, filed by R. Terry McDougald.(hrs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDougald v. Walmart et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. Terry McDougald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Municipal Court of Ozark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?