Mizell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al(MAG+)
Plaintiff: Haywood Jackson Mizell
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Case Number: 1:2021cv00569
Filed: August 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Jerusha T Adams
Referring Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
2 Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Andress, Donald)
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPLY in Support of #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Sanctions filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Manley, Reid) Modified on 10/18/2021 to clean up text. (dmn, )
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (Docs. #10 , #11 ) filed by Haywood Jackson Mizell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(dmn, )
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Attorney Donald Keith Andress, and Reid Stephens Manley added for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (dmn, ) (see Doc. #10 for pdf)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Attorney Reid Stephens Manley added for PHH Mortgage Corporation. (dmn, ) (no pdf see Doc. #11 for pdf)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Attorney Rachel R Friedman added for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (dmn, ) (no pdf see Doc. #10 )
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Andress, Donald)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Friedman, Rachel)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION for Sanctions by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Mortgage, #2 Exhibit B - Foreclosure Deed, #3 Exhibit C - 2017 Probate Action, #4 Exhibit D - 2019 Dale County Action)(Friedman, Rachel)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Note, #2 Exhibit B: Mortgage, #3 Exhibit C: Foreclosure Deed, #4 Exhibit D: 2013 Action, #5 Exhibit E: Probate Action, #6 Exhibit F: Dale County Action)(Andress, Donald)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS with supporting documents by Haywood Jackson Mizell. (dmn, )
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #5 Summons signed by name illegible for PHH Mortgage Corporation served on 9/7/2021, answer due 9/28/2021. (dmn, )
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons and #1 Complaint signed by K. P. for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. served on 9/7/2021, answer due 9/28/2021. (wcl, )
September 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this case is REFERRED to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/2/2021. (dmn, )
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued; summons and complaint mailed CMRRR to PHH Mortgage Corporation, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (dmn, )
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle as referral judge. Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams no longer assigned to the case as referral judge. (dmn, )
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Haywood Jackson Mizell. (dmn, )
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Complaint Seeking Treble Damages filed by Haywood Jackson Mizell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(dmn, )
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PHH Mortgage Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602064497.), filed by Haywood Jackson Mizell. (Attachments: #1 Filing Fee Receipt)(dmn, )
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Haywood Jackson Mizell. (dmn, ) (no pdf, see Doc. #1 )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mizell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al(MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Haywood Jackson Mizell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Donald Keith Andress
Represented By: Rachel R Friedman
Represented By: Reid Stephens Manley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Rachel R Friedman
Represented By: Reid Stephens Manley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?