Whitt v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
Cornelius Darnell Whitt |
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier, Mark Trawick, Stephanie Fears and Sharon King |
1:2021cv00681 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Kelly F Pate |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Initial partial filing fee received: $20.00, receipt number 4602065448. (bes, ) |
Filing 12 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, #5 Supplement, & #6 Order, signed by C22 KM for Sharon King, served on 11/23/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, #5 Supplement, & #6 Order, signed by C22 KM for Stephanie Fears, served on 11/23/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, #5 Supplement, & #6 Order, signed by C22 KM for Mark Trawick, served on 11/23/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, #5 Supplement, & #6 Order, signed by C22 KM for Spencer Downs, served on 11/23/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, #5 Supplement, & #6 Order, signed by C22 KM for Jason Smoak, served on 11/23/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, #5 Supplement, & #6 Order, signed by C22 KM for James Brazier, served on 11/23/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 1/3/2022; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with #1 complaint & #5 supplement to individuals named as defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 11/22/2021. (amf, ) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint by Cornelius Darnell Whitt. (am, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 11/8/2021, Plf must supplement his #1 Complaint and state the relief he seeks from the Court through this lawsuit; Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 10/25/2021. (es, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #2 motion is GRANTED except to the extent payment of the filing fee is required by this Order, as further set out in order; it is further ORDERED: 1) Plf will make monthly payments of 20 percent of each preceding month's income credited to his account as payments towards the $350 filing fee; and 2) Persons having custody of Plf will forward the payments from Plf's account to the Clerk of this Court each time his account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the Clerk to furnish a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Plaintiff is detained; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 10/25/2021. (furn: acct clerk, cashier) (es, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Cornelius Darnell Whitt. (hrs, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against James Brazier, Spencer Downs, Stephanie Fears, Sharon King, Jason Smoak, Mark Trawick, filed by Cornelius Darnell Whitt.(hrs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.