Banks v. United States of America et al
Jacqueline E. Banks |
United States of America and United States Postal Service |
2:2017cv00406 |
June 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Montgomery |
Gray M. Borden |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDERED that Defendant United States's motion to withdraw its summary judgment motion (Doc. # 29 ) is GRANTED and that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 27 ) is DENIED as moot. Further, it is ORDERED that this action is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/12/2018.(kh, ) |
Filing 26 ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 23 ) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. # 15 ) filed by Defendant United States Postal Service is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff Jacqueline E. Banks's claims aga inst Defendant United States Postal Service are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to amend the docket sheet to reflect that Defendant United States Postal Service has been terminated as a Defendant in this case. Further, it is ORDERED that this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/30/2017. (kh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.