-CSC Price v. USA (Inmate 3)
||John G. Price
||United States of America
||October 4, 1999
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||XX US, Outside State
||Charles S. Coody
||Mark E. Fuller
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 21, 2010
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's 13 Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation is overruled; (2) The 9 Recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) Price's 8 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DISMISSED as a successive § 2255 motion insofar as his conviction and sentence are being collaterally attacked, and to the extent Price's claims allege fraud upon the court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) is DENIED, and the judgment denying his original § 2255 motion stands. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/21/2010. (wcl, )
|November 5, 2010
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re Price's 8 MOTION for Relief from Final Judgment that Price's instant motion be dismissed as a successive § 2255 motion insofar as his conviction and sentence are being collaterally attacked, and to the extent Price's claims allege fraud upon the court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) be denied, and the judgment denying his original § 2255 motion stand; further ORDERED that the parties shall file any objections to this Recommendation on or before November 19, 2010, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 11/5/10. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?