Osuna v. Clark et al (INMATE1)

Case Number: 2:2005cv00173
Filed: February 23, 2005
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 1, 2005 4 Opinion or Order of the Court RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: (1) the plaintiff's challenges to his pending criminal charge and all court actions related to this charge be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (2) th e plaintiff's claims against Greg Gambril, Walt Merrell and Eugenia Loggins be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); (3) Greg Gambril, Walt Merrell and Eugenia Loggins be dismissed from this cause of action; (4) the claims presented by the plaintiff referencing alleged violations of the constitutional rights of inmates Joe Clements and Charles A. Barnes be dismissed without prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (5) the plaintiff's claims challenging the conditions of confinement in the Covington County Jail be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2005. Signed by Judge Vanzetta P. McPherson on 3/1/05. (sl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osuna v. Clark et al (INMATE1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?