Sutton v. McDonnell et al (INMATE 1)
Case Number: 2:2005cv00355
Filed: April 15, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Ronald Sutton that: 1) The plaintiff's claims arising from actions taken against him during his incarceration at the Bibb County Corr. Fac. be dismissed without prejudice to the ri ghts of the plaintiff to file a separate 42 U.S.C. 1983 action in USDC for the Northern District of AL; 2) Cheryl Price, Capt. Freeman and Sgt. McKee be dismissed as parties to this cause of action; 3)The plaintiff's claim challenging the destru ction of his personal property during his confinement at the Kilby Corr. Fac. be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 4) The plaintiff's claim challenging the destruction of his legal materials at the Kilby Corr. Fac. be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 5/7/2005. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 4/26/05. (vmc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. McDonnell et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?