Cox v. Allen et al (INMATE1) DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY REQUESTS UNLESS HAVE LEAVE OF COURT

Case Number: 2:2006cv00989
Filed: November 1, 2006
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 14, 2009 40 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS it is the Recomm of the Mag Judge that: re Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted; 2) Judgment be granted in favor of the defendants; 3) this case be dismissed with prejudice; 4) the costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff. Objections to R&R due by 4/27/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 4/14/09. (vma, )
November 2, 2006 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order as further set out. Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk BCCF; furn: cashier. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/2/06. (vma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. Allen et al (INMATE1) DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY REQUESTS UNLESS HAVE LEAVE OF COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?